Prove the Right People Have the Right Access

Over time, access quietly accumulates. People change roles, projects end, and permissions that were once needed linger long after they should. That drift is exactly what auditors look for and attackers exploit. Dockria's Access Reviews give you a disciplined, repeatable way to keep permissions aligned with the principle of least privilege.

Reviews are organised into campaigns. Each campaign has a name and description, a scope covering all users or specific groups, a defined review period, and the reviewers responsible for it, typically the managers who actually know who needs what. This turns recertification from an ad-hoc scramble into a structured, scheduled process.

For each item, reviewers make a clear decision: Maintain the access exactly as it is, Modify it by keeping some assignments and revoking the rest, or revoke it entirely. An anti-escalation safeguard is built in. The system rejects any change that would grant new permissions, so a review can only ever confirm or reduce access, never quietly expand it.

Affected users are notified that their access was reviewed, and every decision is recorded in full. The result is a complete, audit-ready trail showing who reviewed whom, what was decided, and when, the evidence regulators and security teams expect, produced as a natural by-product of good governance.